Nickelmetal Hydride and Nickelcadmium are both types of What?

Nickel-based batteries, including Nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) and Nickel metal hydride (Ni-MH), form a large category of rechargeable batteries used extensively in both consumer and commercial sectors. Since the 1940s, many portable devices were powered by Ni-Cd batteries, which were later replaced by Ni-MH batteries in the 1990s due to environmental concerns and a broader range of application suitability. Nickelmetal Hydride and Nickelcadmium are both types of What? Both types share several characteristics, with Ni-MH batteries inheriting many features from their Ni-Cd counterparts.

Nickel-Cadmium Batteries (Ni-Cd)

Waldemar Jungner brought the Nickel-cadmium or Ni-Cd batteries to life in the late 1800s, at a period where lead-acid batteries were the main source of rechargeable energy. Despite the sluggish progress and hefty inputs, Ni-Cd batteries surpassed their lead-acid counterparts in several ways. Advances over the years, like the introduction of a porous nickel-plated electrode that housed the active substances, accelerated the evolution to a sealed-self Ni-Cd battery by 1947. Nickelmetal Hydride and Nickelcadmium are both types of What?

Ni-Cd batteries carved a noteworthy niche for themselves in various fields. Medical equipment designated for emergency and biomedical use, professional video cameras, two-way radios, and power tools, all relied on these batteries. The late 20th century Ni-Cd batteries leveraged models that boasted as much as 60 percent higher capacities than their conventional make while compromising on their internal resistance and lifecycle.

The reign of Ni-Cd batteries in the realm of portable devices remained uncontested until the 90s. Their toughness, durability, high discharge rates, and economic viability made them a strong contender even by existing standards. However, their environmental impact, owing to the toxic metals, mainly cadmium they comprised, posed a significant challenge. Thus, their usage has been mostly confined to commercial applications, with the aviation industry, for instance, continuing to find value in them.

One common issue that both Ni-Cd and Ni-MH batteries grapple with is the ‘memory effect’ or the phenomenon wherein batteries appear to have an imprint of the previous energy expended and fail to exceed it. This necessitates a thorough discharge cycle routinely to combat their dwindling capacity due to the memory effect.

To sum up, Ni-Cd batteries come with their fair share of pluses and negatives. Their resilience, wide range of sizes and performance choices, the shortest charging time, and ease of charge are some of the upsides. However, their reduced energy density, requirement of multiple cells to match the voltage offered by other batteries, susceptibility to the memory effect, fairly high self-discharge rate, and their environmental implications due to their high cadmium content are the downsides.

Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries (Ni-MH)

Meticulous research into Nickel-Metal Hydride (Ni-MH) started to intensify in the latter half of the 20th century. However, it was initially fraught with numerous impediments given the instability of metal-hydrides. Researchers then decided to concentrate their energy on the advancement of the Ni-H battery, storing hydrogen under substantial pressure in a stainless-steel container. Astoundingly resilient, with minimum self-discharge, excellent defense against corrosion, and able to function in a myriad of temperatures, the Ni-H battery was perfect for use in space satellites. However, it was less suitable for down-to-earth applications due to its low energy specific ratio and substantial price point. Nickelmetal Hydride and Nickelcadmium are both types of What?

In the 1980s, newly discovered alloy-hydrides provided a solution for the previous stability issues, enabling the fabrication of the Ni-MH battery as a partial substitute for the Ni-Cd batteries. Despite possessing numerous favorable attributes, Ni-MH batteries had a substantial flaw—an excessive self-discharge rate. Moreover, they proved sensitive and more perplexing to charge than their Ni-Cd counterparts. To overcome this, the hydride materials were enhanced in a manner that reduced self-discharge and alloy corrosion, which did lead to a slight decline in specific energy. However, the improved durability and lifespan made them a suitable power source for electric powertrains.

Currently, Ni-MH batteries have established an impressive reputation in the consumer sector, offering an energy density that is markedly higher than Ni-Cd batteries. Their reliability, affordability, and variety in size, spanning from AA to D, make them an attractive and versatile option. Furthermore, they serve as an excellent substitute for disposable and reusable alkaline batteries which are no longer in production.

Ni-MH batteries are considered as stepping stones in the progression towards lithium battery technology—a technology with greater energy density and less toxic components. Despite their continuous evolution and diminished memory effects, Ni-MH batteries still show some lingering weaknesses associated with nickel-based chemistry. Notably though, the drive towards their advancement is largely motivated by environmental considerations aimed at promoting responsible disposal.

With the rise of newer lithium rechargeable technologies and primary batteries, certain characteristics, such as limited cycle life and loading traits of the Ni-MH battery, have become less distinguished. The higher self-discharge rates that Ni-MH batteries suffer from during the storage, set them at a disadvantage when compared with primary alkaline and lithium batteries, which can retain their charge up to a decade. For devices that require immediate use, the need for constant recharging can be a substantial inconvenience. Regardless, manufacturers have continued to refine performance and reduce self-discharge rates, as shown by Panasonic’s Eneloop Ni-MH batteries.

Ultimately, the ultimate choice between Ni-Cd and Ni-MH batteries depends on the consumers’ consideration of the varied characteristics. To sum it up, Ni-MH batteries offer greater energy density, are less susceptible to memory issues, have fewer transportation restrictions, and contain fewer toxic elements. However, they are slightly more expensive, require close monitoring to prevent harmful crystal buildup, exhibit a decline in performance under higher temperatures, and require a more calculated charging system to overcome the reduction in their energy density.

Other Significant Nickel Chemistry Batteries

In the late 19th and early 20th century, an intriguing evolution of battery technology surfaced, spearheaded by Swedish innovator, Waldemar Junger, and further propagated by the celebrated inventor, Thomas Edison. Junger took a bold initiative and replaced cadmium with iron, while also intertwining his discovery with nickel to engineer a novel battery variant. While this innovation was initially plagued with issues such as poor charging efficiency and an undesirable hydrogen generation, Edison’s further exploration and development brought it to the forefront, emphasizing its superiority over traditional lead-acid batteries submerged in sulfuric acid—in respect to functionality in electric vehicles. Yet, the emergence of vehicles operating on gasoline, powered by the very lead-acid batteries Edison was attempting to replace, left his nickel-iron battery outclassed in practicality.

Embodying endurance, the nickel-iron battery showcased a remarkable lifespan exceeding half a century, and a minimum of 20 years when used in standby scenarios. This was owing to its tenacity against overcharging and draining, making it a reliable choice for various applications including excavation activities, railway signal systems, heavy-lifting equipment, and even World War II explosives. However, this battery had its share of pitfalls, including a relatively low energy output and performance deficiency in colder climates. Furthermore, its high production cost significantly outweighed its lead-acid counterparts, and its price closely paralleled that of the more advanced lithium-ion batteries.

As a noteworthy alternative to its nickel-iron cousin, Nickelmetal Hydride and Nickelcadmium are both types of What? This unique energy storage unit left its mark on the railway sector from the 1930s to 40s. Superior to nickel-cadmium and nickel-metal hydride batteries in terms of voltage per cell, the nickel-zinc variant proved to offer excellent recyclability due to the lack of substantial toxic components. Apart from this, it also boasted an affordable price point and impressive power output despite falling short in terms of its lifecycle and self-discharging tendencies. Stay tuned for an upcoming exploration into another genre of secondary batteries—rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, truly a technological marvel in the energy storage world.

This article gathers information from multiple sources, including and a variety of newspapers. Even though we have taken extensive measures to ensure accuracy, we cannot assure the complete verification and 100% correctness of every detail. It is recommended to exercise caution when utilizing this article as a reference for research or reports.
EN -